by Caroline Cox
http://panna.igc.org/resources/pestis/PESTIS.1996.16.html
Introduction
Glyphosate is a broad-spectrum herbicide widely used to kill unwanted plants
both in agriculture and in nonagricultural landscapes. Estimated use in the U.S.
is between 19 and 26 million pounds per year.
Most glyphosate-containing products are either made or used with a surfactant,
chemicals that help glyphosate to penetrate plant cells.
Glyphosate-containing products are acutely toxic to animals, including humans.
Symptoms include eye and skin irritation, cardiac depression, gastrointestinal
pain, vomiting, and accumulation of excess fluid in the lungs. The surfactant used in a common
glyphosate product (Roundup) is more acutely toxic than glyphosate itself; the
combination of the two is
yet more toxic.
In animal studies, feeding of glyphosate for three months caused reduced weight
gain, diarrhea, and salivary gland lesions. Lifetime feeding of glyphosate
caused excess growth and death of liver cells, cataracts and lens degeneration, and increases in the
frequency of thyroid, pancreas, and liver tumors.
Glyphosate-containing products have caused genetic damage in human blood cells,
fruit flies, and onion cells.
Glyphosate causes reduced sperm counts in male rats, a lengthened estrous cycle
in female rats, and an increase in fetal loss together with a decrease in birth
weights in their offspring.
It is striking that laboratory studies have identified adverse effects of
glyphosate or glyphosate containing products in all standard categories of
toxicological testing.
Two serious cases of fraud have occurred in laboratories conducting toxicology
and residue testing for glyphosate and glyphosate-containing products.
------------------------------------------------
Advertised as herbicides that can "eradicate weeds and unwanted grasses
effectively with a high level of environmental safety,"1
glyphosate-based herbicides can seem like a silver bullet to those dealing with
unwanted vegetation. However, an independent, accurate evaluation of their
health and environmental hazards can draw conclusions very different than those
presented by these advertisements.
The
following summary of glyphosate's hazards is intended to serve that purpose. It
will appear in two parts: Part 1 discusses the toxicology of glyphosate, its
metabolites, and the other ingredients of glyphosate products and Part 2 will
discuss human exposure to glyphosate and its ecological effects.
Glyphosate, N-(phosphonomethyl) glycine (Figure 1), is a post-emergent,
systemic, and non-selective herbicide used to kill broad-leaved, grass, and
sedge species.2 It has been registered as a broad spectrum herbicide in the U.S. since 1974 and is used to
control weeds in a wide variety of agricultural, lawn and garden, aquatic, and
forestry situations.3
Most glyphosate herbicides contain the isopropylamine salt of glyphosate. A
related chemical, the sodium salt of glyphosate, acts as a growth regulator in
sugar cane and peanuts and is marketed for that purpose. The monoammonium salt
of glyphosate is also marketed as an herbicide and growth regulator.4
Glyphosate products are manufactured by Monsanto Company worldwide. The
herbicide is marketed under a variety of trade names: Roundup (including Roundup
D-Pak, Roundup Lawn and Garden Concentrate, and Roundup Ready-to-Use) and Rodeo
are the most common U.S. trade names.2 The sodium salt is sold
as Quotamaster. The monoammonium salt is sold as Deploy Dry.2
Other brand names used for the isopropylamine salt are Accord,5 Vision, Ranger,
and Sting.2
As an herbicidal compound, glyphosate is unusual in that essentially no
structurally related compounds show any herbicidal activity.6
Use
Glyphosate is the eighth most commonly used herbicide in U.S. agriculture and
the second most commonly used herbicide in nonagricultural situations. Estimated
annual use according to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is
between 15 and 20 million pounds in agriculture and between 4 and 6 million
pounds elsewhere.7 The largest agricultural uses are in the production of soybeans, hay and pasture, corn, and oranges.4
About 25 million applications per year are made in U.S. households; most of
these are made on lawns or outdoor areas where a total vegetation kill is
wanted.8
In California, where pesticide use reporting is more comprehensive than in other
states, about 3.4 million pounds were used in 1992; about 25 percent of this was
used along rights-of-way, while 15 percent was used on almonds and 10 percent
was used on grapes.9
Mode
of Action
The mode of action of glyphosate is "not known at this time,"4
according to EPA. However, "herbicidal action probably arises from the
inhibition of the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids."10 These
amino acids (phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan) are used in the synthesis
of proteins and are the essential for growth and survival of most plants. One
particular enzyme important in aromatic amino acid synthesis, called
5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase, is inhibited by glyphosate.10
Glyphosate also "may inhibit or repress"4 two other
enzymes, chlorismate mutase and prephrenate hydratase, involved in other steps
of the synthesis of the same amino acids. These enzymes are all part of what is
called the shikimic acid pathway, present in higher plants and microorganisms
but not in animals.11
Two of the three aromatic amino acids (tryptophan and phenylalanine) are
essential amino acids in the human diet because humans, like all higher animals,
lack the shikimic acid pathway, cannot synthesize these amino acids, and rely on
their foods to provide these compounds. Tyrosine is synthesized in animals through another pathway.12
Glyphosate can affect enzymes not connected with the shikimic acid pathway. In
sugar cane, it reduces the activity of one of the enzymes involved in sugar
metabolism, acid invertase. This reduction appears to be mediated by auxins, plant hormones.13
Glyphosate also affects enzyme systems found in animals and humans. In rats,
injection into the abdomen decreases the activity of two detoxification enzymes,
cytochrome P-450 and a monooxygenase, and decreases the intestinal activity of
the enzyme aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase (another detoxification enzyme).14
"Inert" Ingredients in Glyphosate-containing Products
Virtually every pesticide product contains ingredients other than what is called
the "active" ingredient(s), those designed to provide killing action.
Their purpose is to make the product easier to use or more efficient. These ingredients are called
"inert," although they are often not biologically, chemically, or
toxicologically inert. In general, they are not identified on the label of the
pesticide product.
In the case of glyphosate products, many "inerts" have been
identified. Roundup contains a polyethoxylated tallowamine surfactant (usually
abbreviated POEA), related organic acids of glyphosate, isopropylamine, and
water. Both Rodeo and Accord contain glyphosate and water.15
(However, label instructions usually require adding a surfactant during use.15)
See "Toxicology of 'Inert' Ingredients of Glyphosate-containing
Products," p. 17, for basic information about these "inert"
ingredients.
Many of the toxicology studies that will be summarized in this factsheet have
been conducted using glyphosate, the active ingredient, alone. Some have been
conducted with commercial products containing glyphosate and "inert"
ingredients. When toxicology testing is not done with the product as it is
actually used, it is impossible to accurately assess its hazards.
We will discuss both types of studies, and will identify insofar as is possible
exactly what material was used to conduct each study.
Acute Toxicity to Laboratory Animals
Glyphosate's acute oral median lethal dose (the dose that causes death in 50
percent of a population of test animals; LD50) in rats is greater than 4,320
milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) of body weight. This places the herbicide in Toxicity Category III
(Caution).4 Its acute dermal toxicity (dermal LD50) in rabbits
is greater than 2,000 mg/kg of body weight, also Toxicity Category III.4
If animals are given glyphosate in other ways, it is much more acutely toxic.
When given intraperitoneally (the dose applied by injection into the abdomen),
glyphosate is between 10 and 20 times more toxic to rats (with an LD50 between
192-467 mg/kg)2,16 than it is when given orally.
Intraperitoneal injection also caused fever, cessation of breathing, and
convulsions.17 While this kind of exposure is not one that
would be encountered under conditions of normal use, these studies indicate the
kinds of effects glyphosate can potentially cause in mammals.
Commercial glyphosate-containing products are more acutely toxic than glyphosate
alone. Two recent (1990 and 1991) studies compared the amount of Roundup
required to cause death in rats with the amount of either glyphosate alone or
POEA alone that would cause death. The studies found that in combination, the
amount of glyphosate and POEA required to kill was about 1/3 of a lethal dose of
either compound separately. The Roundup formulation tested was also more toxic
than POEA alone.18,19
As with glyphosate alone, glyphosate-containing products are more toxic when
administered other ways than orally. Inhalation of Roundup by rats caused
"signs of toxicity in all test groups,"20 even at
the lowest concentration tested. These signs included a dark nasal discharge,
gasping, congested eyes, reduced activity, hair standing erect,21
and body weight loss following exposure.20 Lungs were red or
blood-congested.21 The dose required to cause lung damage
and mortality following pulmonary administration of Roundup Lawn and Garden
Concentrate or Roundup-Ready-to-Use (the glyphosate product is directly forced
into the trachea, the tube carrying air into the lungs) was only 1/10 the dose
causing damage through oral administration.18
Effects on the Circulatory System: When dogs were given intravenous injections
of glyphosate, POEA, or Roundup so that blood concentrations were approximately
those found in humans who ingested glyphosate, a variety of circulatory effects
were found. Glyphosate increased the ability of the heart muscle to contract.
POEA reduced the output of the heart and the pressure in the arteries. Together
(Roundup), the result was cardiac depression.22
Eye Irritation: Glyphosate is classified as a mild eye irritant by EPA, with
effects lasting up to seven days4 although more serious
effects were found by the World Health Organization. In two of the four studies
they reviewed, glyphosate was "strongly irritating"2
to rabbits' eyes and a third test found it "irritating."2 In tests of
glyphosate-containing products, all eight products tested were irritating to
rabbit eyes, and four of the products were "strongly" or
"extremely" irritating.2
Skin Irritation: Glyphosate is classified as a slightly irritating to skin.
Roundup is a "moderate skin irritant" and causes redness and swelling
on both intact and abraded rabbit skin. Recovery can take more than two weeks.20
Acute Toxicity to Humans
The acute toxicity of glyphosate products to humans was first widely publicized
by physicians in Japan who studied 56 cases of Roundup poisoning. Most of the
cases were suicides or attempted suicides; nine cases were fatal. Symptoms of
acute poisoning in humans included gastrointestinal pain, vomiting, excess fluid
in the lungs, pneumonia, clouding of consciousness, and destruction of red blood
cells.23 They calculated that the mean amount ingested in the
fatal cases was slightly more than 200 milliliters (about 3/4 of a cup). They
believed that POEA was the cause of Roundup's toxicity.23 More
recent reviews of glyphosate poisoning incidents have found similar symptoms, as
well as lung congestion or dysfunction,24-26, erosion of the
gastrointestinal tract,24,26 abnormal electrocardiograms,26
massive gastrointestinal fluid loss,27 low blood pressure,23,26 and kidney damage or failure.24,25,27
Smaller amounts of Roundup also cause adverse effects. In general these include
the skin or eye irritation documented in animal studies, as well as some of the
symptoms seen in humans following ingestion. For example, rubbing of Roundup in
an eye caused swelling of the eye and lid, rapid heartbeat, palpitations, and elevated blood pressure. Wiping the face with a
hand that had contacted leaky Roundup spray equipment caused a swollen face and
tingling of the skin. Accidental drenching with Roundup (horticultural strength)
caused recurrent eczema of the hands and feet lasting two months.25
Different symptoms have been observed when a different type of exposure has
occurred. In Great Britain, a study compared the effects of breathing dust from
a flax milling operation that used flax treated with Roundup with the effects of
dust from untreated flax. Treated flax dust caused a decrease in lung function
and an increase in throat irritation, coughing, and breathlessness.28
Subchronic Toxicity
Experiments in which glyphosate was fed to laboratory animals for 13 weeks
showed a variety of effects. In experiments conducted by the National Toxicology
Program (NTP), microscopic salivary gland lesions were found in all doses tested
in rats (200 - 3400 mg/kg per day) and in all but the lowest dose tested in mice
(1,000-12,000 mg/kg per day). Both the parotid and submandibular salivary glands
were affected in rats; in mice the lesions were confined to the parotid gland.
Based on further experiments, NTP concluded the lesions were mediated by the
adrenal hormone adrenalin.29
The NTP study also found evidence of effects on the liver: increases in bile
acids as well as two liver enzymes were found in both males and females. Other
effects found in this study were reduced weight gain in male and female rats and
mice; diarrhea in male and female rats; and changes in the relative weights of
kidney, liver and thymus in male rats and mice.29
Other subchronic laboratory tests found decreased weight gains (using doses of
2500 mg/kg per day)30 along with an increase in the weights of brain, hearts,
kidney, and livers in mice.2 In rats, blood levels of
potassium and phosphorus increased at all doses tested (60-1600 mg/kg/day) in
both sexes. There was also an increase in pancreatic lesions in males.4
As in acute toxicity tests, glyphosate-containing products are more toxic than
glyphosate alone in subchronic tests. In a 7 day study with calves, 790 mg/kg of
Roundup caused labored breathing, pneumonia, and death of 1/3 of the animals
tested. At lower doses decreased food intake and diarrhea were observed.2
Chronic Toxicity
Glyphosate is also toxic in long-term studies. The following effects were found
in lifetime glyphosate feeding studies using mice: decreased body weight,
excessive growth of particular liver cells, death of the same liver cells, and
chronic inflammation of the kidney. Effects were significant only in males and at the highest dose tested (about 4800 mg/kg of body weight
per day). In females, excessive growth of some kidney cells occurred.31
At a lower dose (814 mg/kg of body weight per day) excessive cell division in
the urinary bladder occurred.2
Lifetime feeding studies with rats found the following effects: decreased body
weight in females; an increased incidence of cataracts and lens degeneration in
males; and increased liver weight in males. These effects were significant at
the highest dose tested (900-1200 mg/kg of body weight per day).4
At a lower dose (400 mg/kg of body weight per day) inflammation of the stomach's
mucous membrane occurred in both sexes.2
Carcinogenicity
The potential of glyphosate to cause cancer has been a controversial subject
since the first lifetime feeding studies were analyzed in the early 1980s. The
first study (1979-1981) found an increase in testicular interstitial tumors in
male rats at the highest dose tested (30 mg/kg of body weight per day).32
as well as an increase in the frequency of a thyroid cancer in females.33
The second study (completed in 1983) found dose-related increases in the frequency of a rare
kidney tumor in male mice.34 The most recent study (1988-1990)
found an increase in the number of pancreas and liver tumors in male rats
together with an increase of the same thyroid cancer found in the 1983 study in
females.35
All of these increases in tumor incidence are "not considered
compound-related"35 according to EPA. In each case,
different reasons are given for this conclusion. For the testicular tumors, EPA
accepted the interpretation of an industry pathologist who said that the
incidence in treated groups (12 percent) was similar to those observed in other
control (not glyphosate-fed) rat feeding studies (4.5 percent).36
For the thyroid cancer, EPA stated that it was not possible to consistently
distinguish between cancers and tumors of this type, so that the incidences of
the two should be considered together. The combined data are not statistically
significant.33 For the kidney tumors, the registrants
reexamined slides of kidney tissue, finding an additional tumor in untreated
mice so that statistical significance was lost. This was despite a memo from
EPA's pathologist stating that the lesion in question was not really a tumor.34
For the pancreatic tumors, EPA stated that there was no dose-related
trend and no progression to malignancy. For the liver tumors and the thyroid
tumors, EPA stated that pairwise comparisons between treated and untreated
animals were not statistically significant and there was no progression to
malignancy.35
EPA concluded that glyphosate should be classified as Group E, "evidence of
non-carcinogenicity for humans."35 They added that this
classification "is based on the available evidence at the time of
evaluation and should not be interpreted as a definitive conclusion that the
agent will not be a carcinogen under any circumstances."35
From a public health perspective, the results of the laboratory tests leave many
questions unanswered. An EPA statistician wrote in a memo concerning one of the
carcinogenicity studies, "Viewpoint is a key issue. Our viewpoint is one of
protecting the public health when we see suspicious data."36
Unfortunately, EPA has not taken that conservative viewpoint in its assessment
of glyphosate's cancer-causing potential.
There are no studies available to NCAP evaluating the carcinogenicity of Roundup
or other glyphosate-containing products. Without such tests, the carcinogenicity
of glyphosate-containing products is unknown.
Mutagenicity
Laboratory studies of a variety of organisms have shown that glyphosate-containing
products cause genetic damage:
*
In fruit flies, Roundup and Pondmaster (an aquatic herbicide consisting of
glyphosate and a trade secret surfactant)37 both increased the
frequency of sex-linked, recessive lethal mutations. (These are mutations that
are usually visible only in males because two damaged genes are required in order to be expressed in females.) In this study, the frequency of
lethal mutations was between 3 and 6 times higher in fruit flies that had been
exposed to glyphosate products during their larval development than in unexposed
flies.38
* A laboratory study of human lymphocytes (one type of white blood cell) showed
an increase in the frequency of sister chromatid exchanges following exposure to
high doses of Roundup.39 (Sister chromatid exchanges are
exchanges of genetic material during cell division between members of a
chromosome pair. They result from point mutations.)
* In Salmonella bacteria, Roundup was weakly mutagenic at high concentrations.
In onion root cells, Roundup caused an increase in chromosome aberrations.40
Glyphosate alone has rarely caused genetic damage in laboratory tests. None of
the mutagenicity studies required for registration of glyphosate have shown it
to be mutagenic. Tests included studies of mutations in hamster ovary cells,
bacteria, and mouse bone marrow cells.4 Glyphosate was also
not mutagenic in other studies of rats, mice,2 and onion cells40
but caused chromosome stickiness and fragmentation in water hyacinth root
cells.41
Reproductive Effects
Laboratory studies have demonstrated a number of effects of glyphosate on
reproduction, including effects on mothers, fathers, and offspring.
In rat feeding studies, glyphosate reduced sperm counts (at the two highest
doses tested) and lengthened the estrous cycle, how often a female comes into
heat (at the highest dose tested).29 Other effects on mother
rats in laboratory tests include soft stools, diarrhea, breathing rattles,
red nasal discharge, reduced activity, growth retardation, decreased body weights,
and increased mortality.2 Effects on offspring included an
increase in fetal loss, a decrease in the number of embryos successfully
implanted into the uterus, a decrease in the number of viable fetuses, a slight
decrease in litter size, a decrease in fetal and pup weights, and an increase in
problems with breast bone formation.2 Effects were observed at
the highest doses tested (1500 and 3500 mg/kg of body weight per day).2
In a study of rabbits using doses that were lower than those used in the rat
studies above, glyphosate caused diarrhea, nasal discharge, and death in
mothers.2 The only effect on offspring was a decrease in fetal
weight in all treated groups.42
A study in which glyphosate was fed to rats for three generations after which
the offspring were examined for birth defects found kidney damage at a
relatively low dose (30 mg/kg of body weight). However, a second study (only two
generations long) did not find similar effects, and EPA called the damage in the
first study "spurious."4 From a public health
perspective, however, a new three generation study is crucial.
Toxicology of Glyphosate's Major Metabolite
In general, studies of the breakdown of glyphosate find only one metabolite,
minomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA).2 (See Figure 5.)
Although AMPA has low acute toxicity (its LD50 is 8,300 mg/kg of body weight in
rats)20 and is only slightly irritating to eyes,43
it causes a variety of toxicological problems. In subchronic tests on rats, AMPA
caused decreased weight gain in males; an increase in the acidity of urine in both males and
females; an increase in the activity of an enzyme, lactic dehydrogenase, in both
sexes; a decrease in liver weights in males at all doses tested; and excessive
cell division in the lining of the urinary bladder and in part of the kidney in
both sexes.20 AMPA is much more persistent than glyphosate;
studies in eight states found that the half-life in soil (the time required for
half of the original concentration of a compound to break down or dissipate)
were between 119 and 958 days.2
Quality of Toxicology Testing
Tests done on glyphosate to meet registration requirements have been associated
with fraudulent practices.
Laboratory fraud first made headlines in 1983 when EPA publicly announced that a
1976 audit had discovered "serious deficiencies and improprieties" in
toxicology studies conducted by Industrial Biotest Laboratories (IBT).44
Problems included "countless deaths of rats and mice that were not reported," "fabricated data tables," and "routine
falsification of data."44
IBT was one of the largest laboratories performing tests in support of pesticide
registrations.44 About 30 tests on glyphosate and glyphosate-containing
products were performed by IBT, including 11 of the 19 chronic toxicology
studies.45 A compelling example of the poor quality of
IBT data comes from an EPA toxicologist who wrote, "It is also somewhat
difficult not to doubt the scientific integrity of a study when the IBT stated
that it took specimens from the uteri (of
male rabbits) for histopathological examination."46
(Emphasis added.)
In 1991, laboratory fraud returned to the headlines when EPA alleged that Craven
Laboratories, a company that performed contract studies for 262 pesticide
companies including Monsanto, had falsified test results.47
"Tricks" employed by Craven Labs included "falsifying laboratory notebook entries" and "manually manipulating scientific equipment to
produce false reports."48 Roundup residue studies on
plums, potatoes, grapes, and sugar beets were among the tests in question.49
The following year, the owner/president of Craven Laboratories and three
employees were indicted on 20 felony counts. A number of other employees agreed
to plead guilty on a number of related charges.50 The owner
was sentenced to five years in prison and fined $50,000; Craven Labs was fined
15.5 million dollars, and ordered to pay 3.7 million dollars in restitution.48
Although the tests of glyphosate identified as fraudulent have been replaced,
these practices cast shadows on the entire pesticide registration process.
References
1. Monsanto, the Agricultural Group. Undated. Roundup into the
twenty-first century. St. Louis, MO.
2. World Health Organization, United Nations Environment Programme, the
International Labour Organization. 1994. Glyphosate. Environmental Health
Criteria #159. Geneva, Switzerland.
3. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 1986. Pesticide fact sheet:
Glyphosate. No. 173. Washington, D.C.: Office of Pesticide Programs. (June.)
4. U.S. EPA. Office of Pesticide Programs. Special Review and
Reregistration Division. 1993. Reregistration eligibility decision (RED):
Glyphosate. Washington, D.C. (September.)
5. Monsanto Company Agricultural Products. 1992. Accord label. St. Louis,
MO. (December 1.)
6. Carlisle, S.M. and J.T. Trevors. 1988. Glyphosate in the environment.
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 39:409-420.
7. Aspelin, A.L. 1994. Pesticide industry sales and usage: 1992 and 1993
market estimates. U.S. EPA. Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic
Substances. Office of Pesticide Programs. Biological and Economic Analysis
Division. Washington, D.C. (June.)
8. Whitmore, R.W., J.E. Kelly, and P.L. Reading. 1992. National home and
garden pesticide use survey. Final report, Vol. 1: Executive summary, results,
and recommendations. Research Triangle Park, NC: Research Triangle Institute.
9 California Environmental Protection Agency. Dept. of Pesticide
Regulation. Information Services Branch. 1994. Pesticide use report: Annual
1992. Indexed by chemical. Sacramento, CA. (February.)
10. Cremlyn, R.J. 1991. Agrochemicals: Preparation and mode of action.
Chichester, U.K: John Wiley & Sons. Pp.257-258.
11. Gilchrist, D.G. and T. Kosuge. 1980. Aromatic amino acid biosynthesis and
its regulation. In Miflin, B.J. (ed.) The biochemistry of plants. New York:
Academic Press. Pp. 507-513
12. Metzler, D.E. 1977. Biochemistry: The chemical reactions of living cells.
Pp. 849-850. New York, NY: Academic Press.
13. Su, L.Y. et al. 1992. The relationship of glyphosate treatment to sugar
metabolism in sugarcane: New physiological insights. J. Plant Physiol.
140:168-173.
14. Hietanen, E., K. Linnainmaa, and H. Vainio. 1983. Effects of phenoxy
herbicides and glyphosate on the hepatic and intestinal biotransformation
activities in the rat. Acta Pharma. et Toxicol. 53:103-112.
15. U.S. Dept. of Agriculture. Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Region. 1994.
Glyphosate herbicide information profile. (October.)
16. Olorunsogo, O.O., E.A. Bababunmi, and O. Bassir. 1977 Proc. 1st Intern.
Cong. of Toxicol. (Toronto, Canada). Cited in Olorunsogo, O.O., E.A. Bababunmi,
and O. Bassir. 1979.
Effect of glyphosate on rat liver mitochondria in vivo. Bull. Environ. Contam.
Toxicol. 22:357-364.
17. Olorunsogo, O.O. 1976. Ph.D. thesis, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Cited in Olorunsogo, O.O., E.A. Bababunmi, and O. Bassir. 1979. Effect of
glyphosate on rat liver mitochondria in vivo. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.
22:357-364.
18. Martinez, T.T., W.C. Long, and R. Hiller. 1990. Comparison of the toxicology
of the herbicide Roundup by oral and pulmonary routes of exposure. Proc. West.
Pharmacol. Soc.
33:193-197.
19. Martinez, T.T. and K. Brown. 1991. Oral and pulmonary toxicology of the
surfactant used in Roundup herbicide. Proc. West. Pharmacol. Soc. 34:43-46.
20. Agriculture Canada. Food Production and Inspection Branch. Pesticides
Directorate. 1991. Discussion document: Pre-harvest use of glyphosate. Ottawa,
Ontario, Canada. (November 27.)
21. U.S. EPA. Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances. 1982. Memo from William
Dykstra, Toxicology Branch, to Robert Taylor, Registration Division. (April 29.)
22. Tai, T. 1990. Hemodynamic effects of Roundup, glyphosate and surfactant in
dogs. Jpn. J. Toxicol. 3(1): 63-68. Cited in World Health Organization, United
Nations Environment
Programme, the International Labour Organization. 1994. Glyphosate.
Environmental Health Criteria #159. Geneva, Switzerland.
23. Sawada, Y., Y. Nagai, M. Ueyama, and I. Yamamoto. 1988. Probable toxicity of
surface-active agent in commercial herbicide containing glyphosate. Lancet
1(8580):299.
24. Tominack, R.L. et al. 1991. Taiwan National Poison Center: Survey of
glyphosate-surfactant herbicide ingestions. Clin. Toxicol. 29(1):91-109.
25. Temple, W.A. and N.A. Smith. 1992. Glyphosate herbicide poisoning experience
in New Zealand. N.Z. Med. J. 105:173-174.
26. Talbot, A.R. et al. 1991. Acute poisoning with a glyphosate-surfactant
herbicide ('Roundup'): A review of 93 cases. Human Exp. Toxicol. 10:1-8.
27. Menkes, D.B., W.A. Temple, and I.R. Edwards. 1991. Intentional
self-poisoning with glyphosate-containing herbicides. Human Exp. Toxicol.
10:103-107.
28. Jamison, J.P., J.H.M. Langlands, R.C. Lowry. 1986. Ventilatory impairment
from pre-harvest retted flax. Brit. J. Ind. Med. 43:809-813.
29. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service. National
Institutes of Health. NTP technical report on toxicity studies of glyphosate (CAS
No. 1071-83-6) administered in dosed feed to F344/N rats and B6C3F1 mice. (NIH
Publication 92-3135). Toxicity Reports Series No. 16. Research Triangle Park,
NC: National Toxicology Program.
30. U.S. EPA. Office of Toxic Substances. 1980. EPA Reg. #524-308; glyphosate;
3-month mouse feeding study. Memo from William Dykstra, Health Effects Division,
to Robert Taylor,
Registration Division. Washington, D.C. (September 29.)
31. U.S. EPA. Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances. 1985. Glyphosate; EPA
Reg.#524-308; Mouse oncogenicity study. Washington, D.C. (April 3.)
32. U.S. EPA. Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances. 1982. EPA Reg.
#524-308; Lifetime feeding study in rats with glyphosate. Memo from William
Dykstra, Health Effects Division to Robert Taylor, Registration Division.
Washington, D.C. (February 18.)
33. U.S. EPA. Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances. 1983. Glyphosate; EPA
Reg.#524-308; A lifetime feeding study of glyphosate in Sprague-Dawley rats; a
preliminary addendum to review dated 2/18/83. Memo to Robert Taylor,
Registration Division. Washington, D.C. (February 15.)
34. U.S. EPA. Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances. 1985. Glyphosate Q
Evaluation of kidney tumors in male mice. Chronic feeding study. Memo from L.
Kasza, Toxicology Branch,
to W. Dykstra, Toxicology Branch. Washington, D.C. (December 4.)
35. U.S. EPA. Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances. 1991. Second peer
review of glyphosate. Memo from W. Dykstra and G.Z. Ghali, Health Effects
Division to R. Taylor,
Registration Division, and Lois Rossi, Special Review and Reregistration
Division. Washington, D.C. (October 30.)
36. U.S. EPA Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances. 1985. Use of historical
data in determining the weight of evidence from kidney tumor incidence in the
glyphosate two-year
feeding study; and some remarks on false positives. Memo from Herbert Lacayo to
Reto Engler (both Office of Pesticide Programs, Health Effects Division).
Washington, D.C. (February 26.)
37. Monsanto Co. 1988. Material safety data sheet: Pondmaster aquatic herbicide.
St. Louis, MO. (April.)
38. Kale, P.G. et al. 1995. Mutagenicity testing of nine herbicides and
pesticides currently used in agriculture. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 25:148-153.
39. Vigfusson, N.V. and E.R. Vyse. 1980. The effect of the pesticides, Dexon,
Capton and Roundup on sister-chromatid exchanges in human lymphocytes in vitro.
Mutation Research
79:53-57.
40. Rank, J. et al. 1993. Genotoxicity testing of the herbicide Roundup and its
active ingredient glyphosate isopropylamine using the mouse bone marrow
micronucleus test, Salmonella mutagenicity test, and Allium anaphase-telophase
test. Mut. Res. 300:29-36.
41. Goltenboth, F. 1977. The effect of glyphosate and ametryn on the root tip
mitosis of water hyacinth. Proc. Asian Pac. Weed Sci. 6th Conf. 2:255. Cited in
Hess, F.D. 1989. Herbicide interference with cell division in plants. Chapter 5
of Bgez, P and Sandmann, G. (eds.) Target sites of herbicide action. Boca Raton,
FL: CRC Press, Inc.
42. U.S. EPA. Office of Toxic Substances. 1980. EPA Reg. #524-308; glyphosate;
submission of rat teratology, rabbit teratology, dominant lethal mutagenicity
assay in mice. Memo from W. Dykstra, Health Effects Division, to Robert Taylor,
Registration Division. Washington, D.C. (Undated.)
43. U.S. EPA. Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances. 1986. Guidance for the
re-registration of pesticide products containing glyphosate as the active
ingredient. Washington, D.C. (June.)
44. U.S. Congress. House of Representatives. Committee on Government Operations.
1984. Problems plague the Environmental Protection Agency's pesticide
registration activities. House Report 98-1147. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government
Printing Office.
45. U.S. EPA. Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances. 1983. Summary of the
IBT review program. Washington, D.C. (July.)
46. U.S. EPA. 1978. Data validation. Memo from K. Locke, Toxicology Branch, to
R. Taylor, Registration Branch. Washington, D.C. (August 9.)
47. U.S. EPA. Communications and Public Affairs. 1991. Note to correspondents.
Washington, D.C. (March 1.)
48. U.S. EPA. Communications, Education, And Public Affairs. 1994. Press
advisory. Craven Laboratories, owner, and 14 employees sentenced for falsifying
pesticide tests. Washington, D.C. (March 4.)
49. U.S. EPA. Communications and Public Affairs. 1991. Press advisory. EPA lists
crops associated with pesticides for which residue and environmental fate
studies were allegedly
manipulated. Washington, D.C. (March 29.)
50. U.S. Dept. of Justice. United States Attorney. Western District of Texas.
1992. Texas laboratory, its president, 3 employees indicted on 20 felony counts
in connection with
pesticide testing. Austin, TX. (September 29.)
========================================================
| Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides
| P.O. Box 1393 Eugene, OR
97440
| Phone: (541)
344-5044
| email: ncap@igc.apc.org
========================================================
========================================================
| ** Pesticide Action Network North America (PANNA) **
|
|
|
|Phone: (415) 541-9140 | *For general information
|Fax: (415) 541-9253 | about
PANNA, send an
|email: panna@panna.org
| email message to
|http://www.panna.org/ | panna-info@igc.apc.org
========================================================
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()