BROOKLIN, Canada, Mar 21 2007 (IPS) - Nearly 40,000 hectares of forest vanish every day, driven by the world's growing hunger for timber, pulp and paper, and ironically, new biofuels and carbon credits designed to protect the environment.
The irony here is that the growing eagerness to slow climate change by using
biofuels and planting millions of trees for carbon credits has resulted in new
major causes of deforestation, say activists. And that is making climate change
worse because deforestation puts far more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere
than the entire world's fleet of cars, trucks, planes, trains and ships
combined.
"Biofuels are rapidly becoming the main cause of deforestation in countries like
Indonesia, Malaysia and Brazil," said Simone Lovera, managing coordinator of the
Global Forest Coalition, an environmental NGO based in Asunción, Paraguay.
"We call it 'deforestation diesel'," Lovera told IPS.
Oil from African palm trees is considered to be one of the best and cheapest
sources of biodiesel and energy companies are investing billions into acquiring
or developing oil-palm plantations in developing countries. Vast tracts of
forest in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and many other countries have been
cleared to grow oil palms.
Oil palm has become the world's number one fruit crop, well ahead of bananas.
Biodiesel offers many environmental benefits over diesel from petroleum,
including reductions in air pollutants, but the enormous global thirst means
millions more hectares could be converted into monocultures of oil palm.
Getting accurate numbers on how much forest is being lost is very difficult.
The FAO's State of the World's Forests 2007 released last week reports that
globally, net forest loss is 20,000 hectares per day -- equivalent to an area
twice the size of Paris. However, that number includes plantation forests, which
masks the actual extent of tropical deforestation, about 40,000 hectares (ha)
per day, says Matti Palo, a forest economics expert who is affiliated with the
Tropical Agricultural Research and Higher Education Center (CATIE) in Costa
Rica.
"The half a million ha per year deforestation of Mexico is covered by the
increase of forests in the U.S., for example," Palo told IPS.
National governments provide all the statistics, and countries like Canada do
not produce anything reliable, he said. Canada has claimed no net change in its
forests for 15 years despite being the largest producer of pulp and paper.
"Canada has a moral responsibility to tell the rest of the world what kind of
changes have taken place there," he said.
Plantation forests are nothing like natural or native forests. More akin to a
field of maize, plantation forests are hostile environments to nearly every
animal, bird and even insects. Such forests have been shown to have a negative
impact on the water cycle because non-native, fast-growing trees use high
volumes of water. Pesticides are also commonly used to suppress competing growth
from other plants and to prevent disease outbreaks, also impacting water
quality.
Plantation forests also offer very few employment opportunities, resulting in a
net loss of jobs.
"Plantation forests are a tremendous disaster for biodiversity and local
people," Lovera said.
Even if farmland or savanna are only used for oil palm or other plantations, it
often forces the local people off the land and into nearby forests, including
national parks, which they clear to grow crops, pasture animals and collect
firewood. That has been the pattern with pulp and timber plantation forests in
much of the world, says Lovera.
Ethanol is other major biofuel, which is made from maize, sugar cane or other
crops. As prices for biofuels climb, more land is cleared to grow the crops.
U.S. farmers are switching from soy to maize to meet the ethanol demand. That is
having a knock on effect of pushing up soy prices, which is driving the
conversion of the Amazon rainforest into soy, she says.
Meanwhile rich countries are starting to plant trees to offset their emissions
of carbon dioxide, called carbon sequestration. Most of this planting is taking
place in the South in the form of plantations, which are just the latest threat
to existing forests.
"Europe's carbon credit market could be disastrous," Lovera said.
The multi-billion-euro European carbon market does not permit the use of
reforestation projects for carbon credits. But there has been a tremendous surge
in private companies offering such credits for tree planting projects. Very
little of this money goes to small land holders, she says.
Plantation forests also contain much less carbon, notes Palo, citing a recent
study that showed carbon content of plantation forests in some Asian tropical
countries was only 45 percent of that in the respective natural forests.
Nor has the world community been able to properly account for the value of the
enormous volumes of carbon stored in existing forests.
One recent estimate found that the northern Boreal forest provided 250 billion
dollars a year in ecosystem services such as absorbing carbon emissions from the
atmosphere and cleaning water.
The good news is that deforestation, even in remote areas, is easily stopped.
All it takes is access to some low-cost satellite imagery and governments that
actually want to slow or halt deforestation.
Costa Rica has nearly eliminated deforestation by making it illegal to convert
forest into farmland, says Lovera.
Paraguay enacted similar laws in 2004, and then regularly checked satellite
images of its forests, sending forestry officials and police to enforce the law
where it was being violated.
"Deforestation has been reduced by 85 percent in less than two years in the
eastern part of the country," Lovera noted.
The other part of the solution is to give control over forests to the local
people. This community or model forest concept has proved to be sustainable in
many parts of the world. India recently passed a bill returning the bulk of its
forests back to local communities for management, she said.
However, economic interests pushing deforestation in countries like Brazil and
Indonesia are so powerful, there may eventually be little natural forest left.
"Governments are beginning to realise that their natural forests have enormous
value left standing," Lovera said. "A moratorium or ban on deforestation is the
only way to stop this."
(*This story is part of a series of features on sustainable development by IPS
and IFEJ - International Federation of Environmental Journalists.) (FIN/2007)
http://ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=37035
